Abstract

Background/Objectives: Conjunctival hyperemia is a common clinical finding in clinical practice; however there are significant differences between graders. Vessel detection using deep-learning approaches could enable more objective measures. We aimed to evaluate vascular metrics derived from automated vessel detection and compare these metrics with manual severity gradings. Methods: Slit lamp images from 139 glaucoma patients were included. Images from 103 participants were used as the primary development dataset and the remaining as a validation subset. The images were independently graded by two graders for conjunctival hyperemia using the Efron Grading Scheme. Conjunctival vessels were detected using an automated vessel detection pipeline based on semi-supervised learning. Vessel density, fractal dimension and tortuosity were calculated and compared with the manual Efron grades. Results: Grading of conjunctival hyperemia between the two graders were consistent (Spearman’s rho: 0.79; ICC: 0.79 [95%CI: 0.72–0.84]) but showed significant differences with a higher proportion of differences in the moderate grades. Of the vascular metrics, vessel density showed significant associations with the individual Efron grading and against the mean Efron grading (0.78, p < 0.001). Fractal dimension was significantly associated with the mean Efron grading (0.55, p < 0.001). Agreements were similar in the subset (vessel density, 0.80, p < 0.001; fractal dimension 0.62, p < 0.001). Vessel tortuosity showed lower agreements (<0.23). Conclusions: Vessel density and fractal dimension showed significant associations with manual Efron gradings. These metrics could be potentially used to enable more objective and interpretable measures of conjunctival hyperemia severity.

IPC Classification

Keywords