Archive/Agrivoltaics Can Add Value to High Tunnels in a Subtropical Environment
Agrivoltaics Can Add Value to High Tunnels in a Subtropical Environment
Richard Field, Brian Abernathy, Eshwar Ravishankar et al.
July 7, 2026
en

Abstract

The goal of agrivoltaic engineers is to use growing space for the synergistic production of both food and energy, typically via photovoltaic (PV) capture. Most research in this area has been carried out in arid, high-light environments, but subtropical and temperate regions are also critical production zones, and installation designs vary considerably. In this study, tomato and lettuce production using an agrivoltaic high tunnel (HT) design specific for a subtropical environment (NE Georgia, USA, USDA Zone 8A) was tested using organic production standards. The design utilized typical HTs (approx. 11 m × 5 m) with solar panel arrays hung internally. The design aimed to (1) meet off-grid power needs, (2) mitigate excessive temperature and humidity, (3) balance shade and plant productivity, and (4) simplify installation and maintenance. Treatments were replicated at the HT level, and cultivar differences were assessed to identify genotypes that might serve in future work to optimize yield under partial shade. In 2023 and 2024, we employed novel organic photovoltaic (OPV) panels, which are partially opaque. The OPV panels provided sufficient energy needs to maintain beneficial conditions without external power sources. In 2024, tomato plants in the OPV HTs experienced an area-weighted daily light integral (DLI, mol photons m−2 d−1) of approximately 31.8 (95% CI [28.9, 34.7]), compared to 34.7 (95% CI [31.8, 37.6]) in non-OPV HTs, an approximate reduction of 8%. Average maximum temperatures in the OPV HTs were 33.5 °C (95% CI [30.6, 36.4], compared to 35.1 °C (95% CI [30.9, 39.2]) in the non-OPV HTs, an approximate reduction of 1.6 °C. In 2023, tomato marketable yield was reduced by approximately 0.9 kg per plant in OPV HTs compared to non-OPV HTs (p = 0.023). In 2024, yields were statistically equivalent across all treatments (p > 0.1), while marketable fraction was improved relative to 2023 and was greatest in the HTs. Lettuce yield for both years was unaffected by the presence of HTs or OPV panels (p > 0.1). In 2025, we conducted an additional experiment using a shade-equivalent array of conventional 100% opaque photovoltaic (PV) panels and observed a similar reduction in DLI and no significant impact on tomato yield parameters (p > 0.1 Both designs were effective at equilibrating conditions inside the HTs to ambient temperature levels outside the tunnels. Using results from the study, an app for agrivoltaic value estimation was developed. Based on that software, the presented agrivoltaic design under currently available silicon–PV technology achieves an 18% annual return, assuming system depreciation is minimal and surplus energy could be applied to other on-farm needs.

IPC Classification

G06A01B60H01

Keywords

agrivoltaicsvaluehightunnelssubtropicalenvironmentagronomygoalagrivoltaicengineersgrowingspacesynergisticproductionbothfoodenergytypicallyphotovoltaiccapturemostresearchareacarried
Reference this publication

€ 4.00