Archive/Comparison of Methods for Temporal Correspondence of Spectral Clusters: A Case Study of Post-Catastrophic Landscape Dynamics
Comparison of Methods for Temporal Correspondence of Spectral Clusters: A Case Study of Post-Catastrophic Landscape Dynamics
Hanna Tutova, Olena Lisovets, Olha Kunakh et al.
July 24, 2026
en

Abstract

Monitoring dynamic post-catastrophic landscapes necessitates unsupervised classification approaches capable of incorporating newly emerging landscape-cover states without relying on predefined classes. Within this framework, the temporal correspondence of independently derived spectral clusters presents a critical methodological challenge. This study compared different temporal correspondence approaches for multi-temporal Sentinel-2 imagery of the post-catastrophic floodplain landscape of Khortytsia Island (Ukraine) from 2021 to 2026. In addition to existing temporal cluster correspondence methods based on centroid distance, Mahalanobis distance, Linear Discriminant Analysis, and Random Forest, geometrically oriented approaches employing the elongation and principal-axis orientation of spectral point clouds were evaluated. A series of tests assessed correspondence accuracy, robustness to seasonal and interannual drift, graph connectivity, and consensus structure among different temporal correspondence solutions. The results demonstrated that geometrically oriented approaches preserved temporal correspondence among landscape-cover states with high stability despite phenological and interannual variability. In particular, axis-based correspondence more effectively maintained separation between corresponding and competing clusters amid progressive temporal divergence. Consensus analysis revealed that disagreement among methods was concentrated in ecotonal and actively transforming zones, indicating areas of increased landscape instability. This study shows that the geometry of spectral trajectories contains valuable information for temporal correspondence and provides a promising foundation for monitoring dynamic post-catastrophic landscape systems.

IPC Classification

G06

Keywords

comparisontemporalcorrespondencespectralclusterscasepost-catastrophiclandscapedynamicsgeographiesmonitoringdynamiclandscapesnecessitatesunsupervisedclassificationapproachescapableincorporatingnewlyemerginglandscape-coverstateswithout
Reference this publication

€ 4.00