Abstract

This study evaluates the economic efficiency of the timber-production function across 24 forest stands in Czech Republic, representing monocultures, low-diversity mixed stands, mixed stands, and structurally differentiated stands, in the context of the profound changes that have affected forestry in the Czech Republic in recent years. Bark beetle outbreaks, climatic extremes, and the degradation of Norway spruce monocultures have increased concerns about their long-term production reliability and economic stability, highlighting the need to identify more resilient and sustainable management approaches. Mixed and structurally diversified stands, owing to their species diversity and higher ecological stability, represent a potential alternative; however, their management and economic assessment require more complex planning and interpretation. The study analyses the volume production of selected stands, timber market prices by assortments and tree species recalculated on a per-hectare basis and compares silvicultural and harvesting costs. Economic efficiency is expressed using the cost coefficient (Kn) and the efficiency coefficient (Ke), which quantify both direct production costs and the economic return of individual stand types. Results show that monoculture stands, especially those with a high share of valuable assortments, achieved the highest economic efficiency under the applied static cost–revenue assessment. This finding reflects the observed assortment structure, realized timber prices, and selected management costs. In the broader Central European forestry context, however, previous studies indicate that even-aged conifer monocultures may be more exposed to biotic and abiotic disturbance risks, which can affect their long-term production reliability and economic stability. Stands with higher species and structural diversity exhibit an economic profile that differs substantially from that of monocultures. Based on aggregated price and cost inputs for the reference period 2020–2024, low-diversity mixed and mixed stands reach intermediate values of cost intensity and efficiency, whereas structurally differentiated stands display the highest cost intensity and the lowest efficiency. Monocultures, by contrast, achieve the highest economic efficiency, primarily due to a greater share of high-quality timber assortments (classes I–III). Diversified stand structures (mixed and structurally differentiated stands) broaden the assortment composition and produce a more even distribution of monetization across quality classes. Diversification, therefore, did not maximize immediate economic efficiency in the static assessment; rather, it was associated with broader assortment composition and a less concentrated revenue structure across quality classes.

Keywords