Archive/Hydrodynamic Cavitation for the Sustainable Recovery of Bioactive and Functional Fractions from Agri-Food Residues and Plant-Derived Matrices: Process Functions, Quantitative Evidence, and Application Requirements
Hydrodynamic Cavitation for the Sustainable Recovery of Bioactive and Functional Fractions from Agri-Food Residues and Plant-Derived Matrices: Process Functions, Quantitative Evidence, and Application Requirements
Lorenzo Albanese
July 3, 2026
en

Abstract

Hydrodynamic cavitation is assessed as a conditional process-intensification platform for the sustainable recovery and transformation of bioactive and functional fractions from agri-food residues, food-processing by-products, and plant-derived matrices. The analysis focuses on fractions enriched in polyphenols, flavonoids, pectins, carotenoids, proteins, pigments, essential oils, and other value-added compounds with potential relevance for food, nutraceutical, formulation-oriented, and related high-value applications. Rather than being considered an inherently green or universally superior technology, hydrodynamic cavitation is evaluated according to the specific process functions it can provide, including matrix disruption, mass-transfer enhancement, solvent-use reduction, recovery of pectin-associated fractions, protein extraction, macromolecular restructuring, dispersion, and process integration. Quantitative and scale-relevant indicators are considered where available, including recovery yield, target-compound content, solvent use, operating conditions, treated volume, energy input, fraction quality, and reporting limits. Comparison with ultrasound-assisted extraction, microwave-assisted extraction, pulsed electric fields, subcritical water extraction, natural deep eutectic solvents, and enzyme-assisted extraction indicates that its advantage is most defensible when hydrodynamic effects address a clearly identified matrix or process limitation. The available evidence supports substantial potential for wet matrices, plant by-products, aqueous suspensions, and liquid food systems. However, critical gaps remain in energy reporting, selectivity, recovered-fraction stability, scale-up, downstream processing, and application-oriented validation. Recovered fractions should therefore be regarded as candidate ingredients or functional intermediates, rather than as direct evidence of efficacy in final products.

IPC Classification

C07A01H01

Keywords

hydrodynamiccavitationsustainablerecoverybioactivefunctionalfractionsagri-foodresiduesplant-derivedmatricesprocessfunctionsquantitativeevidenceapplicationrequirementsassessedconditionalprocess-intensificationplatformtransformationfood-processingby-products
Reference this publication

€ 4.00