Abstract

Standalone use of EAHEs for room cooling is a passive and nature-based alternative to air conditioning technology that can be used to mitigate the increase in electricity and GWP-refrigerant consumption associated with cooling in buildings. EAHEs replacing air conditioning is documented in the technical and research literature. However, for office-room cooling, EAHEs are mostly employed as a support to air conditioning systems for precooling outdoor air. The larger cooling loads and the stricter design conditions commonly used in the sizing of office rooms prevent the most commonly investigated EAHE typologies from operating effectively in standalone cooling mode. To assess the feasibility of alternative typologies, such as large-diameter EAHEs, tools that are capable of modeling the complexity of the coupled heat and moisture transfer between air and soil are particularly valuable. For detailed assessments, researchers typically turn to advanced commercial tools; however, developments in free and open-source scientific programming languages that combine symbolic computation packages with efficient numerical solvers of partial differential equations allow analyses at reduced cost that are comparable to those from commercial tools. This paper shows how one such programming language can be used to study the coupled heat and moisture transfer problem in EAHEs. Starting from the symbolic form of the mathematical problem, the numerical implementation is described and validated with monitoring data from an existing large-diameter EAHE. Using the validated computational model, the paper proceeds to study the sensitivity of load removal in EAHEs operating in standalone and precooling cooling modes, highlighting fundamental differences between both operating modes, identifying the most relevant design parameters and providing guidance on the conditions under which an EAHE enables self-sufficient cooling of office buildings. The results show how, for a hot and dry climate, standalone EAHEs with large diameters (∼1 m), buried at depths larger than 3 m, allow the removal of up to 20 kWh/m2 of room sensible cooling loads, a level that is consistent with the cooling demand of low-energy office buildings.

IPC Classification

Keywords