Abstract

Electrochemical CO2 reduction to ethanol is a promising route for circular carbon fuel and chemical production, but practical implementation remains limited by coupled membrane, catalyst, transport, and system integration constraints. This Communication reassesses anion-exchange membranes (AEMs) and bipolar membranes (BPMs) for CO2-to-ethanol electroreduction by integrating recent 2024–2026 advances with foundational membrane and CO2RR literature. The central argument is that membrane selection is not a passive separation choice; instead, it actively controls local pH, charge carriers, CO2 availability, carbonate formation, water activity, proton/cation delivery, product crossover, and downstream techno-economic assessment (TEA) and life-cycle assessment (LCA) burdens. AEM operation can create alkaline cathodic microenvironments that favor C–C coupling, but bicarbonate/carbonate formation imposes carbon-loss, salt-management, and CO2-recovery penalties. BPM operation can improve pH separation and carbon management through water dissociation and bicarbonate acidification, but its viability depends on water-dissociation efficiency, co-ion exclusion, junction stability, hydration management, and voltage control. Recent ethanol-selective catalyst studies further show that copper oxidation state, grain boundaries, subsurface dopants, ionomers, interfacial wettability, and dynamic operation interact strongly with membrane-imposed microenvironments. This Communication proposes a membrane-centered decision framework linking AEM/BPM selection with ethanol selectivity, single-pass carbon utilization, energy efficiency, durability, TEA/LCA boundaries, and future reactor design.

IPC Classification

Keywords