Abstract

Background: High tibial osteotomy (HTO) is commonly performed to manage medial compartment knee osteoarthritis by correcting mechanical alignment; however, the role of adjunctive regenerative therapies remains uncertain. Methods: This retrospective study compared leukocyte-rich platelet-rich plasma (LR-PRP) with leukocyte-poor PRP (LP-PRP) in patients undergoing HTO. Forty patients were allocated into three groups: HTO alone (n = 10), HTO with LR-PRP (n = 20), and HTO with LP-PRP (n = 10). Clinical outcomes were assessed preoperatively and at 12 months using the Visual Analog Scale, Oxford Knee Score, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index. Cartilage repair appearance was evaluated through second-look arthroscopy using the ICRS grading and Koshino staging systems. Multivariable analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), adjusting for baseline imbalances, was employed to evaluate postoperative outcomes. Results: All groups demonstrated significant improvements in pain and function (p < 0.05), with no significant differences among groups. However, Group B exhibited a greater shift toward lower ICRS grades than Group A (p < 0.05), whereas no significant difference was found between Groups C and A. Arthroscopic findings revealed more complete defect coverage and improved structural integrity in the LR-PRP group. Conclusions: These findings demonstrate a clear discrepancy exists between clinical and structural outcomes; while HTO drives substantial and comparable short-term functional improvements across all cohorts, adjunctive LR-PRP is positively associated with a significantly enhanced arthroscopic cartilage repair appearance compared to LP-PRP or HTO alone. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these findings and elucidate the underlying biological mechanisms.

IPC Classification

Keywords