Abstract

By the end of 2024, global photovoltaic (PV) capacity exceeded 2.2 TW, shifting planning from feasibility demonstration toward site–technology co-selection under energy, technical, economic, environmental, territorial, and socio-regulatory constraints. The existing multicriteria literature treats site and technology selection as independent problems under an implicit infinite-grid assumption, which is untenable in markets such as Chile and Peru. This study develops and validates an integrated Delphi–AHP framework with six criteria and eighteen subcriteria calibrated by twenty-eight experts from six Latin American countries. The framework underwent Delphi binary validation, AHP consistency control (CRagg between 0.0013 and 0.0247; discard rate 2.6%), geometric-mean aggregation, deterministic sensitivity analysis, Monte Carlo simulation (10,000 iterations), rank-reversal testing, and nonparametric subgroup analysis. The dominant pair {I2,Ec2}, consisting of grid hosting capacity and LCOE, appears as Top-2 in 84.77% of Monte Carlo iterations and is preserved across 15 of 16 leave-one-out scenarios. Grid hosting capacity surpasses useful solar resource by a factor of 3.41. A demonstrative application to 18 site–technology alternatives confirms the ranking, with an objective-weighting benchmark (entropy, CRITIC) yielding concordant results (Spearman ρ≥0.89). The findings formalize a shift in the PV planning bottleneck from solar resource to grid capacity.

IPC Classification

Keywords