Archive/Preclinical Evaluation of Human Donor-Derived Micronized Bone Marrow Stroma/Parenchyma Versus Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate in a Rat Model of Post-Traumatic Knee Osteoarthritis
Preclinical Evaluation of Human Donor-Derived Micronized Bone Marrow Stroma/Parenchyma Versus Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate in a Rat Model of Post-Traumatic Knee Osteoarthritis
Haruki Nishimura, Zuokui Xiao, Jacob Singer et al.
10 juillet 2026
en

Abstract

Bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) is widely used as a source of mesenchymal stromal/stem cells (MSCs) for musculoskeletal regeneration; however, BMAC lacks essential bone marrow extracellular matrix (ECM) components, a critical component of the stem cell niche that regulates MSC survival, paracrine signaling, and regenerative capacity. We previously demonstrated that an ECM-retaining micronized bone marrow product (BMAX™) preserves pro-regenerative MSC phenotypes in vitro. Human bone marrow from a single donor was processed into conventional BMAC or BMAX™. Post-traumatic osteoarthritis was induced in immunodeficient rats using destabilization of the medial meniscus (DMM). Four weeks after surgery, animals were randomly assigned to receive intra-articular injections of BMAX™, BMAC, or phosphate-buffered saline (n = 10–12 in each group). Pain-related behavior (n = 5–6/group), histological assessment (n = 3–6/group), and micro-computed tomography (n = 4–6/group) were evaluated for up to 8 weeks after treatment. At 4 weeks after treatment, BMAC significantly increased the paw withdrawal threshold compared with PBS (p = 0.0068), whereas BMAX™ significantly reduced knee joint swelling compared with both PBS (p = 0.0235) and BMAC (p = 0.0039), and BMAX™ significantly improved knee bend scores compared with PBS (p = 0.0011). Neither treatment significantly improved OARSI histological scores at this time point. At 8 weeks after treatment, BMAX™ significantly increased the paw withdrawal threshold compared with PBS (p = 0.0305), whereas BMAC showed a non-significant trend (p = 0.0517); both treatments significantly reduced knee bend scores compared with PBS (p = 0.0027 and p = 0.0255), and BMAX™ demonstrated significantly lower knee bend scores than BMAC (p = 0.0090). BMAX™ significantly reduced knee swelling compared with PBS (p = 0.0196). Histologically, BMAX™ significantly improved OARSI scores in both the femoral condyle and tibial plateau compared with PBS (p = 0.0020 and p = 0.0003, respectively), whereas BMAC significantly improved only tibial plateau OARSI scores (p = 0.0014). Furthermore, BMAX™ demonstrated significantly lower femoral condyle OARSI scores than BMAC (p = 0.0243). Micro-computed tomography revealed that both BMAX™ and BMAC significantly reduced medial subchondral trabecular separation compared with PBS (p = 0.0340 and p = 0.0426, respectively), whereas no significant differences were observed between the two treatment groups for other bone structural parameters. In conclusion, preservation of the native bone marrow ECM was associated with improved functional outcomes and greater cartilage regeneration compared with conventional BMAC in this preclinical rat model of post-traumatic osteoarthritis. These findings support the concept that maintaining the native stem cell niche may enhance the therapeutic potential of bone marrow-derived cell therapies for osteoarthritis.

IPC Classification

G06A61

Keywords

preclinicalevaluationhumandonor-derivedmicronizedbonemarrowstromaparenchymaversusaspirateconcentratemodelpost-traumatickneeosteoarthritiscellsbmacwidelyusedsourcemesenchymalstromalstem
Citer cette publication

€ 4.00