Archive/Preclinical Safety Evaluation of a Replication-Defective Canine Adenovirus Type 2 Vector-Based SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Candidate in Murine Models
Preclinical Safety Evaluation of a Replication-Defective Canine Adenovirus Type 2 Vector-Based SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Candidate in Murine Models
Denis Omara, Christian Ndekezi, Susan Mugaba et al.
23 juillet 2026
en

Abstract

Background: Adenoviral vectors are widely used in vaccine development; however, pre-existing immunity to common human adenovirus serotypes can limit their effectiveness. Canine adenovirus type 2 (CAV-2) is a non-human adenovirus with low seroprevalence in humans, making it a suitable alternative vector. Despite its promise, comprehensive preclinical safety data for CAV-2 vector-based vaccine platforms remain limited. In this study, we evaluated the safety profile of a replication-defective CAV-2 vector expressing the Omicron BA.4 SARS-CoV-2 spike immunogen in BALB/c mouse models. Methods: The SARS-CoV-2 CAV-2 vector-based vaccine was expressed and propagated in AD293 cells. The mice received intramuscular prime-boost immunisations with low (1 × 106 PFU), moderate (0.5 × 1010 PFU), or high (1 × 1010 PFU) vaccine doses, alongside empty CAV-2 vector and physiological buffer control groups, and were monitored longitudinally up to Day 72. The mice were clinically assessed at days 0, 7, 21, 42, and 72 for any deviations from normal conditions in comparison to the control groups. Biochemical analyses were performed to evaluate liver and kidney function, as well as any tissue injury due to the vaccine candidate. Hematological parameters were assessed by conducting complete blood counts. Body temperature and weight changes were also monitored as an indicator of systemic toxicity. Results: The biochemical and haematological parameters remained within physiological reference ranges across all dose groups and timepoints, with no dose-related deviations, indicating that the vaccine candidate did not show evidence of hepatotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, tissue or haematological toxicity. Body temperatures remained within normal physiological ranges following both prime and booster immunisations, and body weights increased normally across all groups as the animals grew throughout the study period without any abnormal weight gain or loss. Conclusions: These results suggest that the replication-defective CAV-2-vectored SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidate was well tolerated and did not demonstrate evidence of systemic toxicity under the conditions tested. These findings demonstrate that the CAV-2 vector exhibits a favourable safety profile in murine models when used as a vaccine delivery platform, supporting its translational potential as an alternative adenoviral vector-based vaccine platform. Further studies incorporating additional safety endpoints, including histopathological, vector persistence and shedding evaluation, are warranted to support continued development of the platform.

IPC Classification

G06A61C07

Keywords

preclinicalsafetyevaluationreplication-defectivecanineadenovirustypevector-basedsars-cov-2vaccinecandidatemurinemodelsvaccinesbackgroundadenoviralvectorswidelyuseddevelopmenthoweverpre-existingimmunitycommon
Citer cette publication

€ 4.00